|
Technology
Science
slightly over the edge
A Great
Mambo Chicken And Other Stories of Science Slightly Over the
Edge
by Greg
Rehmke
The cutting
edge of science may be a bit over the edge for everyday life&emdash;but
not for high school debate. In fact, the just-published Great
Mambo Chicken and the Transhuman Condition is just what
the doctor ordered for the space exploration topic. The book
opens with rocket designer Bob Truax building a personal rocket
for Evel Knievel, and launching him across the Snake River
gorge. Truax offered to launch Knievel into space for a million
dollars.
Truax
had earlier designed the Seadragon, a 40-million-pound rocket
booster for delivering large payloads into space. Truax, who
headed the Air Force Space Program, also designed the Excalibur,
the Navy's Thor rocket, and the Volksrocket. Great Mambo
Chicken author Ed Regis reports, "Truax' main passion
has always been rocketry, and in fact he was the designer,
inventor, and world's number one builder of the latest entry
in high tech for the masses, the personal spacecraft. Truax
wanted to do for rockets what Jobs and Wozniak did for computer:
he wanted to make them into everyday items, machines that
people could own, operate, and run by themselves, personally."
Truax
later dropped his asking price for sending a private astronaut
into space to $100,000 (cash&emdash;in advance). The actual
launch would cost more but Truax learned from the Evel Knievel
episode that much more money could be raised selling tickets
and television rights. With the right public relations, launching
someone into space in a rocket designed by an elderly eccentric
should draw a considerable audience. Truax' Volksrocket, the
X-3, was designed and ready to go: cheap VW-style space transport,
but the Navy bought it from him in 1988 for $75,000.
Truax,
like many other rocket engineers, believes people and cargo
should be launched separately: "In Truax's view, the space
shuttle philosophy had everything bass-ackwards. Number one,
since most of the time the shuttle was only going to be launching
satellites (which could be done far more cheaply and efficiently
with unmanned vehicles), there was no need to put people aboard.
People were unnecessary, and they only made for tougher design
margins, and therefore greater expense
"
In addition
Truax thought it was preposterous to design the shuttle to
land at an airport: "It makes about as much sense as requiring
an airplane to be able to land at railroad stations. It flies
like a brick and has a dead-stick landing, the most difficult
of all landings. It's an unparalleled money-sponge
"
After
telling Bob Truax' offbeat story, Great Mambo Chicken follows
with a dozen more, each more outrageous than the last. "Home
on Lagrange" recounts the adventures of the amazing characters
who made up the L5 Society. The L5ers gathered regularly to
design and plan space colonies for the Lagrange zones. And
the L5 Society was mostly hostile to NASA: "L5 members were
fed up with NASA's policy of obsessive perfectionism, which
meant that every launch had to be perfect, which meant triple
backup systems and all manner of superfluous redundancy, which
meant an inordinate amount of testing and expense."
L5 member
Timothy Leary was offended with NASA's consistent choice of
clean-cut types for astronauts, but mostly L5 members were
just plain exasperated by the gradual space exploration slowdown
as NASA's bureaucracy steadily ossified. The shuttle eventually
killed the L5 Society by driving launch costs so high that
any possibility of inexpensively transporting payloads into
space was erased. No space transport, no space colony.
Great
Mambo Chicken also provides a good overview of nanotechnology,
and potential nanotechnology disadvantages. One Nanotech DA
is the "gray-goo problem," an unappealing scenario of gray
gooish nanotech replicators out of control, and gobbling up
the solar system in a few days. Eric Drexler's answer to gray-goo
problems, in Engines of Creation: "We cannot afford certain
kinds of accidents with replicating assemblers." Drexler has
outlined a number of ways to prevent such accidents, and knowing
the specifics might be helpful for debaters caught in gray-goo-slinging
evidence wars about nanotechnology.
Technology
over time
Today's
high technology looks familiar to us only because we use it.
The idea of talking heads in boxes (television) transmitted
over miles of thin air would sound crackpot just a few generations
ago. A single generation ago, microwave ovens would have seemed
like weird magic. So how weird will tomorrow's technology
be? And where do we draw the line between today's crackpots
and visionaries?
Great
Mambo Chicken covers some ideas that seem some distance over
the line, deep, and deep into crackpot territory. People of
the future, a top scientist believes will be "downloaded into
billion-fingered bush robots, and travel electronically by
beaming software copies of themselves from place to place."
It sounds like a great leap forward for space exploration
(if not mankind), but it's not likely to happen anytime soon.
Hans Moravec, the over-the-line scientist behind the transhuman
downloading/bush robot project, says it will take at least
fifty years to develop the technology. That may be an optimistic
projection.
For more
on Moravec, see the front-page story of the Wall Street Journal,
December 7, 1990. Moravec also has a space transportation
plan using rotating skyhooks to lift payloads from Earth.
In the
future, humans (or bush-robots) will eventually bump up against
natural resource limits here on Earth. Ed Regis reviews a
number of scientists' plans for gathering raw materials in
the future. We can search for resources on asteroids and on
other planets, but according to Dave Criswell, we'll eventually
have to look to the sun.
The sun
contains 99 percent of the solar system's mass, which Criswell
figures we will want before too long. Criswell has a plan
for a very-large scale mining operation that would spin matter
out of the sun. As an added benefit, shrinking the sun a bit
will stabilize it, enabling it to shine millions of years
longer. Also discussed are plans to move the earth with solar
sails, move the sun with bigger solar sails, and if necessary
move the whole galaxy with more and bigger solar sails. "While
we might not ever need to move a galaxy," says Keith Henson,
"it's kind of nice to know we can."
Save
the solar system!
Some environmentalists
who have turned their world-view skyward like the idea of
a pristine, undeveloped solar system&emdash;sort of a cosmic
nature park. Most of the scientists and engineers in Great
Mambo Chicken, however, lack a highly developed sense of environmental
consciousness. Most in fact look forward to disassembling
the various planets to build broader living spaces. Freeman
Dyson would smash and reshape Jupiter into a thin sphere that
would circle the entire sun, capture all its currently wasted
energy, and thus allow trillions more people to live comfortably
in (what's left of) the solar system. Dave Criswell would
smash up Mercury to form the powerful machinery needed to
spin matter out of the sun.
Not everyone
in Great Mambo Chicken is so enthusiastic to smash up the
planets for future real estate and sun-draining machinery.
David Thompson, a zoology professor at the University of Wisconsin,
worries that space colonies would be less livable than advertised,
and would encourage a "disposable planet mentality." Thompson's
"Astropopulation" article in Co-Evolutionary Quarterly (Summer
1978) criticized the growing garbage build-up in space, from
orbiting space junk to leftover lunar trash heaps.
Overpopulation
scares that followed the original population of the Club of
Rome study, and the later Global 2000 report, provided part
of the original push to settle in space colonies. But analysis
by Harvard University's Harvey Brooks concluded that "the
world could support a population of a trillion people at a
material standard of living better than that of the most affluent
countries." Brooks envisions two-thirds of these future folks
living on artificial islands spread across the oceans. Brooks'
scenario is a little too spread out for Bob Truax, who figures
that the Earth would support a total population of about a
septillion." That may seem a little crowded, but according
to Great Mambo Chicken author Ed Regis, "even mainstream Harvard
University social-scientist types were saying that the carrying
capacity of planet Earth had not been even remotely approached."
Physicist
Cesare Marchetti of the Internatinal Institute for Applied
Systems Analysis in Austria, wrote that "from a technological
point of view, a trillion people can live beautifully on Earth,
for an unlimited time and without exhausting any primary resource
and without overloading the environment." ("A Check on the
Earth Carrying Capacity for Man," Energy, Vol. 4, 1979, p.
1107.)
Other
scientists weighed in with studies documenting the lack of
limits to economic growth. H.E. Goeller and Alvin Weinberg
review and project man's past and future natural resource
usage in "The Age of Substitutability," explaining that, "most
of the [Earth's] essential raw materials are in infinite
supply: that as society exhausts one raw material, it will
turn to lower-grade inexhaustible substitutes."
Economists
say, "substitutes are everywhere." As any natural resource
gets more expensive to dig up or process, its price rises.
As the price climbs, resource users begin to look for similar
but cheaper resources to serve as substitutes. Higher prices
encourage more recycling, too.
David
Thompson's doubts about growth faded a bit when the Club of
Rome forecasts proved wrong. Thompson explains, "The Club
of Rome seemed to prove that there were limits, and that we
were already close to them, or beyond. But now that the Club's
predictions have not been met, I have to admit that if there
are any limits, we cannot predict where they lie. What that
Club of Rome people forgot was that as you produce more and
more people you also get more and more brains. You get more
scientists who can figure out different ways to attack problems.
If you double the population you get twice as many scientists."
Thompson now favors the development of space colonies as part
of the healthy biological drive to expand, though he still
argues it shouldn't be necessary to trash the Earth to settle
the colonies.
Great
Mambo Chicken is a book about technological optimism. It chronicles
engineers and scientists who (like children) don't like to
be told what they can't do. They plan time travel machines;
others devise strategies for avoiding the supposedly unavoidable
heat death of the universe. Others, like Dave Criswell, have
come up with strange, but practical shorter range plans. Criswell
proposes holding the 2208 Olympic games in space. Ed Regis
reports that Criswell has even "invented a type of aircraft&emdash;swing-wing
spaceplane&emdash;that could get sports fans up there and
back for the price of a typical ocean crossing."
And as
for the great mambo chickens, well, you'll just have to check
out your local bookstore to discover their story.
|
A
Foundation for Economic Education Website
30
South Broadway, Irvington-on-Hudson, New York, 10533
Questions,
Comments, Suggestions? Email: Debate@fee.org
Main
Website: www.fee.org
|
|